Softitech - Download Latest Games Softwares Movies Tips and Educational Stuff: Comparison

Xiaomi Redmi 2 vs Moto E (Gen 2): Everything you must know

Unknown 0 Comparison, Motorola, Motorola Reports, News, Xiaomi 07:47

</div>
<div class="divclear">
 </div>
Now that the cat's out of the bag, and we have both the low budget 
yet freakishly functional devices: the Xiaomi Redmi 2 and the Moto E 
(Gen 2) in India, we decided to pitch in and bring you the differences 
between the two: help you decide which one's good for you. 
Both 
the Moto E (Gen 1) as well as the Xiaomi Redmi 1S were hot critic 
favorites upon launch setting benchmarks for how budget devices ought to
 be: value for money. And, looking at the spec sheets of both their 
successors, one thing is certain: Motorola and Xiaomi have not 
disappointed us, at least on paper. 
Here's a quick look at the differences between the Redmi 2 and the Moto E (Gen 2): 
<h2>
Design</h2>
 <img align="middle" alt="" border="0" height="266" hspace="0" src="http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2015March/dsc_7568_650_031215011223.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(215, 215, 215); margin: 2px 0px;" title="" valign="top" vspace="0" width="400" /> 
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2: 134 x 67.2 x 9.4 mm (5.28 x 2.65 x 0.37 in) 133 g 
 
Moto E (Gen 2): 129.9 x 66.8 x 12.3 mm (5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 in) 145 g  
Both
 the original Redmi 1S and the Moto E (Gen 1) were fairly decent looking
 devices, however, of the two Xiaomi's offering somehow appeared better 
looking in contrast. One thing that brought the Redmi 1S down was its 
weight: simply put it was 'fat' and chunky. 
It's nice to see 
Xiaomi has worked on that aspect and significantly toned down the Redmi 
2, which is way lighter than the original, even lighter than the Moto E 
(Gen 2). 
In terms of looks, the Redmi 2 follows close on the heels
 of its predecessor, which is not bad since the original was fairly 
decent looking. That said we would have liked some changes here and 
there so it looked somewhat new. The Moto E (Gen 2) also doesn't budge a
 lot from the design of the original Moto E, save some changes here and 
there. It now comes with a single chrome speaker grill, replacing the 
dual grills found in last year's model. Also, the back panel in the Moto
 E (Gen 2) is now non-removable. 
Design taste is of course 
subjective, however, we feel the Mot E (Gen 2) with its personalized 
colored bands looks a little more youthful and funky in comparison to 
the Redmi 2. However, the Redmi 2 gives you the option of a removable 
back cover with a removable battery, which most buyers would like. 
<h2>
 </h2>
<h2>
Display</h2><script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>

<ins class="adsbygoogle"
style="display:inline-block;width:300px;height:250px"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-1586787011300843"
data-ad-slot="2065645016"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>

<img align="middle" alt="" border="0" height="225" hspace="0" src="http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2015March/xiaomi-redmi-2_031215011357.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(215, 215, 215); margin: 2px 0px;" title="" valign="top" vspace="0" width="400" /> 
 
This
 is one area where the Xiaomi Redmi 2 should win hands down. It features
 a 4.7-inch HD IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen display with a 720x1280 
pixels resolution that roughly translates to 312 ppi. It's true that 
Xiaomi has retained the display specifications of the original Redmi 1S 
in the Redmi 2, however, we were pretty pleased with the brightness and 
viewing angles of the original for its price, and the Redmi 2 should not
 be any less. 
The Moto E (Gen 2) on the other hand comes with a 
bigger display than the original Moto E, however, it retains its 
resolution and pixel density, which means the display shall hurt a bit 
more on the Moto E (Gen 2), considering that the original was no display
 marvel. 
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2: 4.7-inch HD IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen display with a 720x1280 pixels resolution (~312 ppi pixel density) Corning Gorilla Glass 2 
 
Moto E (Gen 2): 4.5-inch HD IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen display with a 540x960 pixels resolution (~245 ppi pixel density) Corning Gorilla Glass 3, oleophobic coating 
<h2>
 </h2>
<h2>
Performance</h2>
 <img align="middle" alt="" border="0" height="299" hspace="0" src="http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2015March/xiaomi_redmi_2_side_031215011223.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(215, 215, 215); margin: 2px 0px;" title="" valign="top" vspace="0" width="400" /> 
 
The
 Redmi 2 is powered by a 1.2 GHz quad-core 64-bit Qualcomm MSM8916 
Snapdragon 410 CPU with Adreno 306 GPU and 1GB RAM, a significant 
upgrade over the Redmi 1S. There is a second limited edition variant 
that will ship with 2GB RAM, same CPU though at a later date 
(undisclosed). 
The Moto E (Gen 2) 3G that is available for now is 
powered by a 1.2 GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 CPU with Adreno 
302 GPU and 1GB RAM, which is same as found in last year's model. Now, 
the 4G variant of the Moto E (Gen 2) will ship with a 1.2GHz quad-core 
64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 processor with the same 1GB RAM. It is 
expected to be available sometime in May, 2015. 
Of course, the Moto E (Gen 2) 4G makes more sense when comparing with the Redmi 2 and it's not available for now. 
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2: 1.2 GHz quad-core Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 CPU with Adreno 306 GPU and 1GB RAM, 8GB internal expandable up to 32GB 
 
Moto E (Gen 2): 1.2 GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 CPU with Adreno 302 GPU and 1GB RAM, 8GB internal expandable up to 32GB 
<h2>
 </h2>
<h2>
Software</h2>
This
 is one area that shall depend upon the discretion of the user. While 
the Moto E (Gen 2) runs Android 5.0.2 Lollipop out-of-the-box, the Redmi
 2 runs Android 4.4.4 KitKat with MIUI 6 on top. 
All Motorola 
devices give you stock Android experience, it's as real as it gets. The 
new Moto E comes with the very latest Android iteration. 
Some 
parts of Xiaomi's MIUI 6 have undoubtedly been borrowed straight out of 
Apple's textbook, however, at the price Xiaomi sells its devices it's a 
great deal to have the functionality of Android along with the look and 
feel of some iOS thrown in. That said Lollipop still has an edge and is 
definitely a better looking one too. 
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2: Android 4.4.4 KitKat with MIUI 6 
 
Moto E (Gen 2): Android 5.0.2 Lollipop 
<h2>
 </h2>
<h2>
Camera</h2>
 <img align="middle" alt="" border="0" height="133" hspace="0" src="http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2015March/xiaomi-redmi-2_031215011223.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(215, 215, 215); margin: 2px 0px;" title="" valign="top" vspace="0" width="400" /> 
Let's
 be honest, Motorola devices don't have the best of cameras around. 
Xiaomi on the other hand is known to pack in decent snappers in all its 
devices. In our review of the original Redmi 1S and the Redmi Note, we 
found the cameras on board fairly decent for their price range. Sadly, 
the same cannot be said about Motorola devices, the Moto E in 
particular. 
 
Even specs wise, the Moto E (Gen 2) fails to raise 
eyebrows, but is indeed an improvement over the original Moto E 
especially since it now comes with autofocus abilities, and also decks 
in a front VGA snapper. An LED flash is still missing though. 
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2: Rear: 8 MP, autofocus, LED flash 1080p@30fps Front: 2 MP, 720p 
 
Moto E (Gen 2): Rear: 5 MP, autofocus 720p@30fps Front: VGA 
<h2>
 </h2>
<h2>
Battery</h2>
 <img align="middle" alt="" border="0" height="283" hspace="0" src="http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2015March/screen-shot-2015-02-26-at-2_031215011640.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(215, 215, 215); margin: 2px 0px;" title="" valign="top" vspace="0" width="400" /> 
 
Both
 the original Moto E and the Redmi 1S were hailed for their good battery
 life, however, the Moto E was benchmark setting in this department. 
We
 believe the traditional shall continue with their latest renditions, 
although the Moto E (Gen 2) seems to have an upper hand yet again, at 
least on paper. 
It's good to see both Xiaomi and Motorola bumping 
up their batteries: the Moto E (Gen 2) now comes with a 2390mAh battery,
 while the Redmi 2 decks in a 2200mAh battery. 
That said the Moto E's battery is non-removable while users can remove/change the battery in case of the Redmi 2. 
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2: 2200 mAh 
 
Moto E (Gen 2): 2390 mAh battery 
<h2>
 </h2>
<h2>
Value</h2>
Both the Xiaomi Redmi 2 and the Moto E (Gen 2) 3G have been priced at Rs.6,999
 and will be available for grabs exclusively via Flipkart. However, as 
is now synonymous with Xiaomi products in India, the Redmi 2 will be 
available via the much-loathed flash sale method. The Moto E (Gen 2) is 
now available to buy online, while the first flash sale of the Redmi 2 
will be held on 24 March, 2015. 
In terms of specifications set, 
the Xiaomi Redmi 2 clearly has an upper hand over the Moto E (Gen 2) 3G.
 The 4G LTE variant of the Moto E (Gen 2) seems more sense when you 
compare with the Redmi 2, however, there is still some time before it 
becomes available for sale. 
Our verdict: if you can go through the
 ordeal of the flash sale method, you should go for the Redmi 2. In case
 you want an easy buy, the Moto E (Gen 2) 3G should be every bit a 
capable device. The 4G variant will be price a little higher than the 3G
 one, however, we suggest you wait for it. In case you're in a hurry, 
you can go for either: the Moto E will give you stock Lollipop 
out-of-the-box as also a bigger battery (non-removable), the Redmi 2 
will of course give you more power and 4G at the same price. </div>
</div>

Xiaomi Redmi 2 vs Moto E (Gen 2): Everything you must know

Now that the cat's out of the bag, and we have both the low budget yet freakishly functio...

Motorola Moto Turbo vs Google Nexus 6: Which one is a better buy?

Unknown 0 Comparison, Google, Motorola, Motorola Reports, Nexus 23:32

</div>
<div class="divclear">
 </div>
Earlier in the day, Motorola launched the Moto Droid in India for a price of Rs.41,999.
 The phone is billed as a flagship Moto phone, which will sit a notch 
above the Moto X (2nd generation) in Motorola's portfolio. 
 
The 
interesting bit is that there is another phone that Motorola makes, 
which offers similar hardware to the new brand new Moto Turbo. It is the
 Google Nexus 6. The Nexus 6 has gigantic 6-inch display, which means it
 is a phablet. However, other than the screen size, both the phones have
 similar hardware. 
 
So which one is a better deal for you? To 
answer this question, we need to take a look at the differences between 
the two devices. 
 
Display 
The biggest difference 
between the two devices is the size of the display. The Moto Turbo has a
 rather mainstream 5.2-inch display while the Nexus 6 has a massive 
5.96-inch display, which means it is larger than most smartphones in the
 market. Both phones have the same Quad-HD resolution and use the same 
AMOLED display technology. However, the difference in the screen size 
means that the Moto Turbo will have the sharper display. In fact, as of 
now, it probably has the sharpest display of any smartphone in India, 
but that will change once the Galaxy S6 launches in India. 
 
Design  
 Design
 is another area, where the Moto Turbo and the Nexus 6 differ. The Nexus
 6 has a design similar to that of the Moto X. It has a curved back and a
 metal frame lending it good ergonomics. The Turbo has a more standard 
design, which includes capacitive Android buttons, instead of virtual 
buttons found on the Nexus 6. It also has patterned back, which looks 
more like Motorola phones of yesteryear. Its back is made out of unique 
materials that include ballistic nylon and a DuPont Kevlar Fibre. 
Motorola claims that the phone is five times stronger than steel and is 
water resistant, something the Nexus 6 is not. 
 
Size 
Design
 and display apart, the Nexus 6 is also the larger device amongst the 
two. The Nexus 6 is 10.1mm thick and weighs 184 grams. The Turbo is 
thinner and lighter at 8.3mm and 169 grams. This means, the Turbo is 
going to be an easier phone to hold and carry. 
 
Camera 
Both
 phones have different imaging hardware on the back. The Moto Turbo has a
 21-megapixel sensor on the back with a staggered dual flash 
arrangement. The Nexus 6, on the other hand, has a lower resolution 
13-megapixel sensor, but adds optical image stabilisation into the mix, 
which could be a boon for low-light performance and videos.  Apart from 
this, both phones have similar hardware on the front as both have 
2-megapixel front cameras. Both phones can shoot 1080p video at 30 
frames per second. 
 
Performance 
Currently, both the 
Nexus 6 and the Moto Turbo have the most potent processing package found
 on an Android phone. Both are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 
quad-core SoC and the Adreno 420 GPU. In addition, both phones also have
 3GB RAM. The Nexus 6 is available in a 32GB and a 64GB model, the Moto 
Turbo is only available in a 64GB model. Neither of the devices support 
microSD card expansion. 
 
Software 
Both the phones 
run on Android 5.0 Lollipop. While the Nexus 6 directly gets updates 
from Google, Motorola's Turbo gets updates at a slightly slower pace 
from Motorola, which minutely customises the core Android Lollipop 
experience. The Moto Turbo adds useful additions like the Moto Migrate 
app and advanced touches control capabilities. It also offers a 
simplified camera apps. Besides these additions, both phones run similar
 software. 
 
<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>

<ins class="adsbygoogle"
style="display:inline-block;width:300px;height:250px"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-1586787011300843"
data-ad-slot="2065645016"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>

Battery 
While the Moto Turbo has a 
smaller footprint, it is the phone with the larger battery. It has a 
massive 3,900mAh battery, which is huge by any metric. On the other 
hand, the Nexus 6 despite the larger display packs a smaller 3,220mAh 
battery. Motorola also touts other goodies like fast charging where the 
phone can attain 60 per cent charge in 30 minutes and Qi-Wireless 
charging capabilities. The Nexus 6 also adds wireless charging support ,
 but overall it is likely the Moto Turbo will have the better battery 
life. 
 
Connectivity 
Both phones support 3G 
connectivity in India, however don't offer dual-SIM functionality. It is
 also worth noting that neither Motorola or Google mention 4G India 
support for both the devices, so if you are looking for something more 
future ready, the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 could come in to the picture. 
 
Wrap Up 
On
 paper, as the Moto Turbo is cheaper and offers bigger battery, it 
appears to be the better value for money proposition. Moreover, it also 
is available in a generous 64GB version, which is cheaper than the 32GB 
Nexus 6. The Moto Turbo also adds things like water resistance, which 
can be crucial to a user, and runs a Nexus like build of Android 
Lollipop. That said, we'd wait for it, as they say, the proof of the 
pudding is in the tasting and we'd hold back till we properly test the 
product. 
 
Price 
Moto Turbo - Rs.41,999 
Google Nexus 6 - Rs.43,999 (32GB) and Rs.48,999 (64GB) </div>
 
 
 
 
Thank You:-</div>

Motorola Moto Turbo vs Google Nexus 6: Which one is a better buy?

Earlier in the day, Motorola launched the Moto Droid in India for a price of R s. 41,999. The phone is ...

iPhone 6 and LG G3 get the best smartphone award at MWC

Unknown 0 Apple, Apple Reports, Award, Comparison, LG, LG Reports, Motorola, Motorola Reports, News, Reports 07:39

</div>
<div class="divclear">
 </div>
GSM Association is a group of mobile operators and related companies 
that is behind the mega MWC event. The event mainly focuses on mobile 
technology and this was the 20th year of the association. GSM Mobile 
Awards happened along with other traditional events at the MWC. The 
awards are judged by a panel of nearly 300 people from different 
backgrounds like independent experts, analysts, journalists, academics, 
and in some cases, mobile operator representatives. 
Since all the 
entries concluded in November last year, the awards were given to 
nominees that were launched before. The awards have various categories 
that relate to the mobile industry. A few fairly known categories were:- 
 
Best Smartphone: (2 winners) Apple iPhone 6, LG G3 
Best
 Mobile Product or Service for Women in Emerging Markets: BBC Media 
Action: Mobile Academy & Mobile Kunji for Harnessing Mobile for 
Community Health Worker, 
Best Mobile Game App: Gameloft for Asphalt 8: Airborne, 
Best Mobile Media and Publishing App: News Republic Start a Conversation, 
Most Innovative Mobile App: Mnet Mobile for Game on, 
Category of Judges' Choice- Best Overall Mobile App: IFTTT 
Best Low Cost Smartphone (SUB$100): Motorola Moto E 
Best Mobile Tablet: Microsoft Surface Pro 3 
Best Solution for Growing Smaller or Independent Networks: Vodafone for Vodafone Interstandard Roaming Services 
Best Mobile Service or App for Consumers: Bharti Airtel for One Touch Internet 
GSM
 organizes the largest event in mobile technology and these awards 
acknowledge the growth in the industry by introducing categories that 
not only deal with sophisticated advancements but also social 
developments that are achieved by the means of technology.  </div>
 =<a href="http://indiatoday.intoday.in/technology/story/iphone-6-and-lg-g3-get-the-best-smartphone-award/1/422499.html" target="_blank_"></a></div>

iPhone 6 and LG G3 get the best smartphone award at MWC

GSM Association is a group of mobile operators and related companies that is behind the mega ...

Quick comparison: Samsung Galaxy S6 vs HTC One (M9

Unknown 0 Comparison, HTC, Samsung, Samsung VS HTC 09:10

<div class="hub-caption">
<div class="story-details">
<a href="http://indiatoday.intoday.in/author/Sahil-Mohan-Gupta/1.html"></a></div>
<div class="divclear">
</div>
 
Design  
 
Design
 has been HTC's strongest suit in the last few years. Universally, its 
M7 and M9 have proven to be the prettiest Android phones around. 
Samsung's offerings, unfortunately, haven't been loved on the flipside. 
This year, things could change as the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge bring
 impressive industrial design stories to the table. Both phones have a 
sturdy metal frame backed up with Gorilla Glass on both sides. And they 
look impressive. 
HTC decided to stick with its tried and tested 
metal design, which it heralded in the M7 back in 2013 and refined it in
 the M8 in 2014. The M9 looks very similar to the M8, and that is not a 
bad thing. It looks handsome, no doubt, but it no longer is a no-brainer
 if you are a stickler for aesthetics. Samsung's offering is equally 
compelling and it will be a subjective choice at the end of the day. 
Samsung
 also does some things better than HTC's flagship. Its S6 and S6 Edge 
are significantly slimmer at 6.8mm and 7mm respectively. The M9, by 
modern standards, is rather chubby at 9.6mm. It is also heavier than the
 two Galaxy S6 models at 157 grams. The Galaxy S6 weighs 138 grams while
 the Galaxy S6 edge is lighter at 132 grams. 
If you'd be 
critical, then as the M9 looks similar to its predecessor, it can be 
argued it brings nothing new to the table in terms of design. It perhaps
 lacks an X-factor, which Samsung nails with the curved screen on the 
Galaxy S6 edge. 
Display  
 
While Samsung's phones have
 always possessed beautiful eye catching Super AMOLED screens, they 
often don't have colours that appear true to life. HTC's screens often 
do well in this regard with the use of LCD technology. The M9 continues 
to use a 5-inch 1080p LCD screen, which should be good going by history.
 However, on paper, it is no match for Samsung's Super AMOLED quad-HD 
panel on the Galaxy S6. The M9 is super sharp at 441 pixels per inch, 
but the Galaxy S6 has an almost absurd 577 ppi density. The Galaxy S6 
Edge even adds curves on the sides of the screen, which makes it the 
more innovative one of the lot. HTC's LCD screen will probably fare 
better under direct sunlight, but Samsung's screen will likely have 
deeper blacks and will be more battery efficient. 
Camera  
 
For
 the last few years, HTC has attempted to innovate on the camera front. 
However, it has failed to provide its users with a dependable camera. 
Compared to phones from Sony, Samsung and Apple, HTC's One line of 
phones have had inferior cameras. Its UltraPixel technology has also 
copped a lot of flak and this has resulted in HTC adopting a traditional
 20.7-megapixel camera on the back. This is a good move of course, but 
the 16-megapixel camera on the Galaxy S6 according to Samsung is better 
than even the iPhone 6 Plus. Even in our hands-on we found that the 
camera on the Galaxy S6 was very impressive. So, beating the Galaxy S6 
camera will be a hard act. 
The rear camera also misses out on 
optical image stabilisation something which the Galaxy S6 has, so it is 
likely its low-light performance will be inferior. 
On the front, 
however, things could be very tight between the Galaxy S6 and the One 
(M9). HTC has not completely abandoned its UltraPixel technology as now 
it makes an appearance on the front. UltraPixel technology basically 
allows the camera sensor to absorb more light as the pixel size is 
significantly larger. This improves performance in low-light but it 
sacrifices resolution, which results in softness and less detail. This 
results in inferior image quality for a rear camera, but as people 
mostly take selfies from the front camera, it can turn out to be a boon.
 HTC has also thrown in a flash for the front camera.  Samsung has also 
added a 5-megapixel camera on the front, which has a wide f/1.9 
aperture, however, it missed out on a flash. 
Overall, things should be close when it comes down to the front camera. 
Performance  
 
The
 HTC One (M9) is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 octa-core 
processor, which also has support for 64-bit apps. This is probably 
going to be the processor that is used in most Android flagships in the 
first half of the year. Already, LG has announced the G-Flex 2, which 
uses the same chip. It is a fast chip and performance should be very 
very good. 
However, if Samsung is believed then the Galaxy S6 
could one-up the One (M9). Unlike most manufacturers, Samsung even makes
 its own Exynos line of processors. In previous years, its Exynos 
variants were reserved for markets like India where there was no 4G 
connectivity. It used Qualcomm's silicon for developed markets like the 
US as its own processors lacked 4G support. With the new Exynos 7420, 
that limitation no longer exists. 
Moreover, in terms of pure 
performance too, Samsung believes it has a better SoC as it is based on a
 14nm process, which is an industry first. It claims that the Exynos 
7420 octa-core processor is 35 per cent faster than the Qualcomm 
Snapdragon 805, which used in the Galaxy Note 4 and is more frugal. 
This
 could be the case as Qualcomm's chips normally have an advantage over 
rivals like Samsung and MediaTek because of their custom Krait cores. 
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 uses standard ARM Cortex A53 and A57 cores, 
just like the Exynos 7420, but is manufactured on an inferior 20nm 
process.  While both phones have 3GB RAM, the Galaxy S6 also uses faster
 DDR4 RAM. 
In recent weeks, leaked benchmarks of the Galaxy S6 
have also revealed that the phone benchmarks higher than any Android 
smartphone we have seen to-date. 
Software  
 
Both the 
phones run on Android 5.0 Lollipop. Samsung has vastly improved its much
 maligned TouchWiz UI by adopting a less intrusive UI and Google's 
material design principles. It also is the one that is heavier on 
feature with cool multitasking functions like multi-window. That said, 
we expect the HTC One (M9) to provide the better UI as it has the 
cleaner and prettier Sense UI. HTC also allows the user to theme the 
interface, a feature the Galaxy S6 lacks. 
One area, where the Galaxy S6 could have an edge is in terms of professional use as it incorporates the Knox security package. 
Battery  
 
The
 HTC One (M9) has the bigger 2,880mAh battery. The Galaxy S6 has a 
smaller 2,550mAh battery, while the 'edge' model has a 2,600mAh battery.
 However, things are little more complicated. As the Galaxy S6 uses the 
more frugal display technology, things could even out. That said, things
 could also get reversed as Samsung's phones have incredible quad-HD 
screens as opposed to a  standard 1080p resolution on the M9. 
Samsung's
 phones also have more tricks. The South Korean company claims that its 
phone can offer 4 hours of battery life with just 10 minutes of 
charging, and goes on to say that its batteries are the fastest charging
 modules currently on a phone. HTC does not make any such claims, 
however, it leverages Qualcomm's Quick Charge technology, which too 
ensures faster charging. 
Memory

Samsung's new 
Galaxy smartphones uncharacteristically eschew a microSD card slot. To 
make up for that, Samsung offers generous SKUs which start at 32GB and 
go up to 128GB. HTC's One (M9) is only offered in one model. A 32GB 
model, but it also has a microSD card slot that supports up to 128GB of 
expansion. 
Miscellaneous  
 
In typical Samsung 
fashion, the Galaxy S6 comes with a bag full of tricks. It has an iPhone
 like fingerprint scanner, and also has a heart rate monitor on the 
back. These are certainly nice additions. HTC's One M9 provides neither,
 however, it does come with new BoomSound speakers, which in the past 
have proven to be the best speakers on a smartphone. They also use 
Dolby's audio technology, which is always a good thing. Considering the 
single speaker and slim design of the S6, it is likely that the One (M9)
 will have an edge in terms of audio and loudspeaker quality. 
Wrap Up 
 
The
 Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge seem like a drastic overhaul of Samsung's 
flagship smartphone, while the HTC One (M9) feels more like an 
evolutionary step. Both offer a lot in their own right, but purely based
 on the specs, the Galaxy S6 could have a slight edge in core 
functionality and certainly packs an X-factor with its 'edge' model that
 adds the innovative curved display. The One (M9) is expected earlier in
 March, while the Galaxy S6 and S6 edge will be launched in April. </div>
 </div>

Quick comparison: Samsung Galaxy S6 vs HTC One (M9

Design Design has been HTC's strongest suit in the last few years. Universally, its M7 and M9 have prove...